My stepfather developed inoperable brain cancer and died. He has three daughters from previous marriages, and two stepdaughters (my sister and I). He said my mother should live in the house he owns until she died, and the proceeds would be split between us five women.
I had a falling out with my sister two years prior to our stepfather dying, and she started manipulating my mother to make her the executor of the trust. One year after my stepfather died, I received legal papers showing that my stepsister hired an attorney.
It appears that my stepfather, on the exact day he died of brain cancer, signed an addendum to his trust leaving everything to my sister, cutting out his three stepdaughters. My stepsister witnessed this document, and it wasn’t notarized.
I was denied a copy of the family trust. My mother’s attorney said I would have to be a beneficiary. My mother and sister removed me when, I believe, they forged my stepfather’s signature. Do I have any recourse other than hiring an attorney?
Will karma get them in the end?
Stepsister, Sister and Daughter
Related: ‘I feel slighted’: My husband and I are in our 70s. We married 3 years ago. He’s leaving his $1.8 million home to a 10-year-old relative. Is that normal?
Dear Stepsister,
If your mother is still alive, you may have to rely on karma, if that’s what you believe is necessary in this case to put right something you believe is wrong. If she inherits everything, including the house that your stepfather had earlier intended to be split between his two children and three stepchildren, she could still divide the estate in accordance with her own wishes.
That said, the timing and circumstances will look bad in any courtroom. You can typically contest a will or trust on the following grounds: lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence from a family member and improper execution. Given the nature of your stepfather’s illness, what happened seems highly inappropriate. In some cases, the trust may also need to be notarized.
Benazeer “Benny” Roshan, partner and chair of the Trust and Probate Litigation Group at Greenberg Glusker, says the facts described here are certainly troubling, but unfortunately not uncommon. “Deathbed changes to an estate plan are inherently suspect, especially when they upend a prior estate plan’s dispositive provisions such as beneficiary designations,” he says.
“Most jurisdictions have laws that allow an heir or beneficiary to challenge a subsequent change or amendment [described as an addendum in your letter] that eliminates their beneficial interest in a will or trust,” he adds. “A legal proceeding that formally challenges an estate plan is commonly known as a trust or will ‘contest.’”
Legal action is expensive. “Individuals whose beneficial shares of an estate are wiped out via deathbed changes should consult attorneys and explore the costs versus benefits of taking formal action,” Roshan says. “They should be aware that most jurisdictions have time limitations on bringing an action and, if one is contemplated, time may be of the essence.”
A complex legal issue
Daniel McKenzie, an attorney with The McKenzie Law Firm in Centennial, Colo., says he doesn’t know whether karma will get them in the end, but the only way to address your concerns would be by agreement between the relevant parties, which seems unlikely, or a court order. “Can those be done without an attorney?” he says. “Sure, but it would be a terrible idea.”
Law varies by state, and McKenzie’s analysis is based on California law, although most states share similar laws on challenging an estate plan. He also doesn’t address the notary part of your letter because, he says, there is not always a formal requirement to notarize a trust or trust amendment, although it’s common best practice that allows for a trust to be recorded.
McKenzie believes you have a case, based on how difficult it would be for someone with late-stage brain cancer to sign a document, let alone understand what he was doing. But your question was whether you needed a lawyer. “Unfortunately, this is a highly complex matter, requiring sophisticated expert testimony and nuanced legal arguments,” he says.
“Assuming that the mother is also deceased and the assets passed to the sister outside of probate, the writer can likely initiate a civil case, alleging lack of capacity and undue influence,” he adds. “The fact that the dad executed the document so late in his life when he was likely in a very compromised state would be supportive of both claims.”
This reader wrote to me recently with a similar situation: his uncle persuaded his ailing grandmother to cut everyone else out of the family trust. He likened it to a bitter Shakespearean tragedy. As this suggests, such dire 11th-hour events are not unheard of. People do dramatic and ill-judged things when there is an ailing relative and a lot of money involved.
More from Quentin Fottrell:
My father has dementia and ‘forgave’ my brother’s $200,000 house loan. The nursing-home notary said he was of sound mind. What can we do?
My husband bought our house with an inheritance. I signed a quitclaim. He said I could live there after he dies, but changed his mind. What now?
Low-paying jobs are the economy’s way of saying you should get a better job’: I’ve decided to stop tipping, except at restaurants. Am I wrong?
You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.
Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Readers write to me with all sorts of dilemmas. Post your questions, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.
By emailing your questions to the Moneyist or posting your dilemmas on the Moneyist Facebook group, you agree to have them published anonymously on MarketWatch.
By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Co., the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.